Unfortunately, and it pains me to say this, but one of these two is going to have to start to play badly for the other one to win the Heisman. Blasphemous? Hardly. Hear me out.
In the end, I think our season would be better served by neither winning the Heisman. They are both equally awesome players -- maybe a slight edge to Pat White -- and both steal a great deal of the others "stats."
Think about it. When does Pat White's Heisman stock go up? When Slaton has a tough game. And vice-versa. When they both dazzle, which is bound to happen more often than not, they'll end up splitting votes.
You might bring up Matt Leinart and Reggie Bush. Both won Heismans. Both played on the same team. Well, two things: 1) Steve Slaton is not Reggie Bush. That's only a compliment to Bush, not a knock on Slaton. Bush was a highlight reel waiting to happen. Slaton is also a home-run hitter, but not in the same way; and 2) Leinart was Bush's elder. When Leinart won, he was the sole leader of the Trojans. Sure, it was Bush's breakout season, but it was still Leinart's show.
At WVU, it's both Pat's and Steve's show. They share it almost equally. My hope is that they both blow it up, split votes, finish 2nd and 3rd (or something like that) in the Heisman, and we go to the National Championship.
Then Devine wins it in 2009.
Two Heisman Hopefuls, Or None?