The Orange Bowl Will Define Dana Holgorsen's First Season At West Virginia
WVU finished a third straight season with a record of 9-3. Even though this was enough for us to "win" the Big East Championship and secure our third BCS bowl in seven years, it was a disappointment nonetheless in the eyes of many fans. The disappointment lies in the fact that we had so many chances, but as in years past, we let them slip away.
It was disappointing because it was supposed to be different this year with Bill Stewart out and Dana Holgorsen at the helm of our Mountaineers. The struggles on special teams, the untimely turnovers and never putting together a full game on offense were supposed to be things of the past. It was Stewart's X's and O's, not the Jimmys and Joes last year.
Yet game after game this year, the same frustrations reared their ugly head and kept WVU from blowing the doors off our sub-par Big East opponents.
However, Dana Holgorsen and our Mountaineers can make us forget about our regular season struggles with a convincing victory over Klempsen in our upcoming exhibition game called the Orange Bowl.
Clemson
Offense: Total Yards 441.5 -- 29th; Passing Yards 284.8 -- 21st; Rushing Yards 156.8 -- 61st; Points Scored 33.6 -- 26th
Defense: Total Yards 379.4 -- 58th; Passing Yards 202.9 -- 38th; Rushing Yards 176.5 -- 81st; Points Allowed 26.2 -- 62nd
WVU
Offense: Total Yards 459.6 -- 18th; Passing Yards 341.8 -- 7th; Rushing Yards 117.8 -- 100th; Points Scored 34.9 -- 20th;
Defensel Total Yards 340.3 -- 27th; Passing Yards 199.6 -- 32nd; Rushing Yards 140.8 -- 51st; Points Allowed 26.2 -- 63;
Despite the above stats, the experts in Vegas set have put Clemson as 3.5 point favorites early and the line has remained static because most of the action hasn't started yet and barring the loss of a major player, it isn't likely to jump significantly in any direction.
I'm not exactly sure why Klempsen is favored at all seeing as how the stats slightly line-up in WVU's favor. WVU is better in every offensive category, excluding rushing yards a game. We are also better than or equal to Clemson in every defensive category.
I guess one could say that Clemson is more battle tested playing in the ACC?
Alright, now that you have climbed back into your chair from LOLing all over the place, we can move onto the coaches.
If you put me on the sidelines, it would be a lot like Dabo Swinney. My enthusiasm and love for my school would show through at all times. However, my lack of knowledge about what is actually happening on the field would be readily apparent at times too. Dabo seems like a great guy, but when he is matched up against Holgorsen, it is no contest.
Holgorsen has a track record of high powered offenses. Dabo has a history of great quotes:
"They ain't Alabama. They ain't LSU. And they're certainly not Clemson. That's why Carolina's in Chapel Hill and USC's in California and the university in this state always has been, always will be Clemson."
Around the middle of the season I was saying that I would take Tajh over Geno, I was wrong. The job Holgorsen has done coaching up Geno and allowing him to lead the offense on the field is still a work in progress. Despite late season struggles in gaining big yards, Geno has been more accurate with his passes.
Holgorsen is trying to erase everything Geno was taught under Jeff Mullen. This is a daunting task seeing as how Mullen's philosophy on offense was to get the ball on the correct hash to set-up the punt.
No matter the outcome of this game, I think the sky is the limit for Dana Holgorsen at WVU. While we will be losing some key parts on defense, we have tons of talent returning on offense next year, assuming nobody bolts for the NFL. Also, don't forget, as Country Roads so eloquently documented last week, the incoming recruiting is extremely talented on paper. If we can find some depth on both lines, this class will set the foundation for Holgorsen's bright future at WVU
With a win, the expectations for Dana Holgorsen's Mountaineers go through the roof. Not only will WVU fans being saying 10 wins or bust, the national media will likely be calling us a dark horse national title contender in our first year in the Big 12.
Don’t forget to show support for your favorite coach by voting him as the 2011 Liberty Mutual Coach of the Year at www.coachoftheyear.com
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Its a shame!
Its a shame that it has taken so long for people to see how weak the ACC is, they aren’t any better then the Big East, our reputation is just worse so everyone thinks Clemson must be better than WVU because Clemson is from the ACC. Oh well a win for WVU will hopefully shut the critics up long enough for us to get into the Big 12!
9 wins from a first year coach with a lot of new starters is...
better than nine wins from a coach who has been around a while.
Why Klempson is favored over WVU by las vegas handicappers
Remember that the odds makers are paid to know who the betting public thinks will win the game and by how much, NOT who they ( the handicappers) think will win the game. They might think that WVU will win by 7, but if the “average” bettor thinks that Klempson will win by 3, then they will call Klempson a 3 point favorite. The handicappers skill is not to predict the eventual winner, but rather to accurately predict what the rest of the betting population will predict as the winner.
Clemson is favored
because they kicked Virginia Tech’s ass. Twice.
Despite the fact that Virginia Tech was EXTREMELY over rated all year, they were ranked pretty high both times.
"that place laid the foundation for who I am. A lot of outsiders make fun of it and say negative things about West Virginia. Fuck them" - Jerry West
by MountaineerAirman on Dec 20, 2011 2:57 PM EST reply actions
Not to mention...
…they beat more ranked opponents. Auburn was #21 at the time, Florida State was #11, Virginia Tech was #11 the first time, and #5 the second time.
We only have one victory over a ranked opponent, #23 Cincinnati.
Now, I’m not saying they’re better than us. I think this is going to be a really close game, but I think we’ll pull it out in the end because I have more faith in Holgs than I do in Swinney. Besides, Virginia Tech, Florida State, and to a lesser degree, Auburn, all ended up being major duds anyway. As long as we DON’T play like we did against Syracuse and Louisville, we should be fine.
"that place laid the foundation for who I am. A lot of outsiders make fun of it and say negative things about West Virginia. Fuck them" - Jerry West
by MountaineerAirman on Dec 20, 2011 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Virginia Tech only lost to Clemson all year. How are they extremely overrated? They beat the teams they played. There are only 15 teams in the country with fewer than 3 losses. VT is one of them. They are ranked 11. I think that is very fair.
I don't think Virginia Tech is bad
I think they were overrated. They in no way deserved to be ranked #5, and #11 now may be fair but it still stretching it, in my opinion, and they DEFINITELY don’t deserve a spot in the Sugar Bowl.
They struggled against East Carolina, winning 17-10. This isn’t the same ECU team that was coached by Skip Holtz, they’ve regressed a bit since then.
Marshall gave them a good game, though they ended up winning comfortably.
They struggled against Duke, only winning by 4. Duke. In football.
They also struggled against a decent at best North Carolina team.
They got manhandled by Clemson in both meetings and the only really decent team they beat was Georgia Tech, and they ended up being more inconsistent than WVU.
Again, I’m not saying Virginia Tech is BAD. They always put together a solid team. I would put them around the 12-17 ranking range. Only losing to one team (albeit twice) I think makes them at least deserve that high, so I don’t think them being 11 is too bad of a stretch. But people still want to talk about Virginia Tech like they’re some kind of juggernaut when they’re not. They don’t have a very good bowl record, the ACC isn’t even that much stronger as the Big East. Both conferences are known for tearing themselves apart from the inside.
"that place laid the foundation for who I am. A lot of outsiders make fun of it and say negative things about West Virginia. Fuck them" - Jerry West
by MountaineerAirman on Dec 21, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions
Well, let me amend that, actually.
Virginia was also a pretty good team this year, albeit very inconsistent. Don’t want to short change them. :P
My point was just that I think that’s the only reason Clemson is favored when they match up so evenly with us.
They lost to a superior SEC team, like we did. (Though let’s admit, LSU is FAR superior to S. Carolina, but still.) They lost a game they shouldn’t have in NC State, like we did with Syracuse. Their loss to Georgia Tech is similar to our loss to Louisville, only GT started hot and finished cold while Louisville started cold and finished hot.
This is going to be a great game regardless.
"that place laid the foundation for who I am. A lot of outsiders make fun of it and say negative things about West Virginia. Fuck them" - Jerry West
by MountaineerAirman on Dec 21, 2011 3:28 PM EST up reply actions

by 




















