Please Sleep On The 2010 Mountaineers At Your Own Risk
Fall-practice is upon us and, despite my steady buzz from starting tailgating in mid-July, I can't help but think forward to see what this version of the Mountaineers might become.
I'm not talking recruiting or potential rules violations, just the 2010 Mountaineers. A nine win team in 2009, we return a ton of starters and have new talent across the board, usually a good recipe for a improving on a previous years' win total. Yet WVU was only voted to finish in a tie for second this year in the Big East. It's a curious vote, considering the mentions I just made. Jock Sanders seems to agree with me:
Hands down [we're the best team in the Big East], and we'll show that this year. It is all about politics. For Pitt to get all those [first-place] votes and we got just as much back as them, it is crazy, but, like I said before, at the end of the year after we play them, they'll regret [being the favorites]. They'll regret it all.
Big words, certainly considering that Pitt will be a very talented team this year. But I applaud Sanders' swagger, mostly because it doesn't seem misplaced.
Swagger gets a bad name sometimes. If we can remember back just a few months, Latwan Anderson chose Miami because of their "swagger." Of course, this was a Miami team that hadn't won anything in years, which confused the hell out of me, but apparently not Mr. Anderson. You might also recall the 2007 Yankees hat debacle, which was WVU's last major foray into swagger.
But not all swagger is created equal. Swagger to basically taunt and flaunt (your skill or lack thereof, considering the result of the USF and Pitt games in 2007), isn't worth the time and effort. Believing you're the best in conference, however, is a confidence I can get behind. I couldn't care less if it ends up on Pitt's bulletin board or not. It's not like this statement is finally going to convince the Panthers to play hard when we meet in November. That was already going to happen. This just tells me Sanders & Co. are committed to being nothing but the best in the Big East this season. And I dig it.
This is a team built for success at a high level. We have more depth at every position than we've had in quite some time. While our QB might be a first year starter, he's a decorated Parade All-American who acquitted himself well in duty last season. And good God the talent we have. Familiar names like Devine, Sanders, Nield, Thomas, and Sands give us strength all over the field. New additions -- Irvin, McCartney, etc. -- give us even more upside. I love this team, which is scaring the crap out of me considering I hate being this optimistic four weeks before the first snap.
But whatever, I will just have to live with thinking that this team can go far -- and I do mean far. How far? FAR!
Note: just so we're on the same page, when "far" is written in bold and underlined, that means really, really, ridiculously far.
Note #2: When you stare at the word "far" a lot, it stops looking like a word. Crazy!
Note #3: I might be stoned.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If you're stoned...share
because you and I are thinking very much alike. Until I seem them in action, the only things that concern me are the OL (they have to be better than last year in passing situations, don’t they?) and an unknown commodity at punter(sounds silly, but a punter can change field position very favorably or very poorly, both very quickly).
I can't wait to see Robert Sands knock someones head
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"And why do we fall, Bruce? So we can learn to pick ourselves up." Thomas Wayne
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
I completely agree w/ you
this team will go FAR. Anything less than 11 total wins (including exhibition…..er, bowl game (unless it’s BCS Champ. Game)) will be disappointing. That allows for 2 losses…….this is reasonable because we are better than LSU this season and the schedule is favorable.
Wait a minute.
Since when is 2 losses acceptable to you? I thought it was undefeated or bust? Anything less than 12-0 is accepting mediocrity and failure!
by Country Roads on Aug 9, 2010 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Did someone steal Columubs' password?
Funny how 12-0 would be the only thing acceptable with less talented teams. I’m confused…
Leave no doubt tonight! Leave no doubt tonight! No doubt! They shouldn't of played the Old Gold'n Blue.
by 5th Year Senior on Aug 10, 2010 11:13 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You know that's never what I said...
I said that 12-0 is what the team should annually strive for……..Hopefully it does become 12-0 or bust….like it is here in Columbus.
Just for the Record:
“6-6 was my prediction…… not my hope, so why would I be happy w/ 9-3.
The reason you play ANY sport is to win the pinnacle of that sport. In college football, it means you must win every game. I don’t think Stewart has it in him to do this…..This is the current unprecedented milestone that has avoided WVU…..Sugar Bowls, Orange Bowls, Fiesta Bowls don’t mean as much to me because that’s not the hardware that you shoot for at the beginning of the season.
Nehlen couldn’t do it….Next
Rodriguez couldn’t do it….Next
My standards ARE too high. Go ahead and get pissed at me because I think we should be in contention for NC’s every year. 9-3, 10-2’s don’t do it, only 12-0 (and occasionally 11-1 if in Big East). I understand that it’s not going to happen every year, but it doesn’t change my view that we should be at that level every year, and I don’t think Stewart is a coach that can get us to that level.
He is of the mindset just before Rodriguez came to town when emphasizing "9-3" to a sports reporter would have been adequate. Sorry Stew, you inherited higher standards. (and I know you read this blog)
by WVUColumbus on Dec 9, 2009 2:41 PM PST"
Yeah, I just did that.
by Country Roads on Aug 11, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions
My only concern.....
is that Jock shouldn’t have stated it to a reporter. I don’t mind him speaking w/ fellow teammates. There has been exactly one instance, in the NFL anyway, where talk wasn’t cheap (last season’s NYJ-Rex Ryan).
Teams like the Bengals and Ravens prefer to talk a big game before the season starts. They hate being “disrespected” and can’t stand not being paper champions.
Meanwhile, the Steelers relish the opportunity to enter a season under the radar, playing w/ house money (due to Ben suspension).
There’s certainly something to be said for that mindset as well……..and mental makeup importance can’t be overstated given my experience in DI college sports (very low DI I give you)
Relishing the opportunity to enter a season under the radar?
Is this coming from the same person who was lamenting WVU’s lack of off-season attention because it hurts the program? And the very individual who claimed that we will never be champions if we always want to play as the underdog?
by Country Roads on Aug 9, 2010 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

















