Kirelawichisms
If you've been reading this blog for more than about 10 seconds, you know I'm an optimist. I tend to find explanations (excuses?) for why our teams don't perform up to the level of expectations we set for them, and I tend to think that tomorrow is inevitably going to be better than today. But I must admit, I am harboring some doubts about this year, and D-Line coach Bill Kirelawich is helping push me closer to the edge with his comments to Dave Hickman in today's Gazette.
Sure, I realize Pat White is gone. Everyone knows Pat White is gone. But everyone also knows that Jarrett Brown is a more than capable fill-in, perhaps even more tailored to our revamped offense featuring an expanded passing game. So we've got that covered.
I know all about the four starting offensive linemen we need to replace and the kind of effect that can have on a team. But the new guys aren't exactly infants---they were highly sought-after recruits who earned some invaluable playing time last year. Given another year under Dave Johnson, they'll be ready.
Heck, I've even lost some sleep over our kicking game. The loss of Pat McAfee can't be understated. But it's not like we've ever lost out on a Big East title because someone returned the opening kickoff for a TD. Oh, right, Mardy Gilyard. Well, that's kickoffs, and that was just one year. We don't ever cost ourselves a BCS berth by giving up punt returns for touchdowns. What's that? 2004 Boston College? Oh. Well, at least that wasn't on national TV. Come again? Louisville 2006? Dang. Well, it could be worse. We could have missed a couple chip shot field goals against Pitt to cost ourselves a shot at a national championship . . . . But I digress. Word is that Scott Kozlowski (Kozlowski, Kirelawich . . . where did we get all these Jewish guys??) is doing fine punting the ball, and Stew spent time in the offseason figuring out how to improve kick coverage. So I'm still holding out hope.
But despite all of those questions, I still feel good about this season because of our defense. We return, what, 8 starters from a top-30 defense last year that was outstanding in the red zone and created tons of turnovers. We get Reed Williams, the heart and soul of the 2007 defense, back from injury. The linebackers should be among the league's best. Even though we lost Ellis Lankster, I'm not worried at all about the defensive backfield---Keith Tandy has been looking good, Brandon Hogan is a budding star, and freshmen Broderick Jenkins and Pat Miller should provide depth.
And that brings me to the defensive line. Even with out Bigfoot Finau, you have to like what this unit has to offer. Potential all-league picks Scooter Berry and Chris Nield should anchor what's supposed to be a very strong line that will free the linebackers and safeties up to make plays. You want depth? Julian Miller, Jorge Wright, and Larry Ford should be ready to step in and Josh Taylor is an adequate fill-in for Scooter. Heck, freshmen Will Clarke, Dominick Davenport, and Curtis Feight may develop into players as well. Even the harshest critic would have trouble finding something to nitpick about this group, right? Here's what Coach Kirlav has to say:
"We stink,'' he said.
...
"The older kids aren't bad,'' he said. "They probably aren't where they should be. And, as far as I'm concerned, we have no depth.
"The whole camp will be one big process to develop someone we can put in the game and count on - and not get our [butts] kicked while they're in there. Hopefully, some of those kids step up.''
Um, okay. How about that Taylor kid? You like him, right?
"Behind Scooter, we have Josh Taylor, who I really like,'' Kirelawich said. "Then I've got nobody. From there on, it's a crapshoot. I don't have a guy at tackle behind Scooter. I don't have one at end.''
Hm. You don't like any of those guys I mentioned?
"Larry Ford, in my mind, has to get a lot better,'' Kirelawich said. "In my mind, he's not near good enough. [Tackle] Jorge Wright is coming along. But that's where he's at: he's coming along. He's not there yet. He's not a ready-for-prime-time player. And the freshmen are freshmen.''
"Somebody's got to step up,'' Kirelawich said. "They signed on here to play and they better get their [behinds] better.''
Alright coach, I'm picking up what you're putting down. If your own coach thinks you're not any good, you're probably not any good. And who am I to argue with the coach? If he says that the unit that is supposed to be the strength of our defense isn't any good, then what hope do we have? All I gotta say is that Tevita Finau better get here soon.
"Don't even ask me about him,'' Kirelawich said.
Touche'.
[photo via www.wvmetronews.com]
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You gotta
take Kirlav’s comments with a grain of salt. That’s the way he’s always been and from his track record, his method seems to work out pretty well. He could have a roster of Reggie White, Warren Sapp, Deacon Jones, etc. to work with and he’d still find something to gripe about. I’ve seen him in practice, he doesn’t berate them the way Trick did, he’s just old school curmudgeonous (is that even a word?) and personally, I think that what D-Linemen need.
That photo is via metronews.com?
Really? Really? Really!?!
by Dr. Charley West on Aug 13, 2009 12:15 PM EDT reply actions
Ya know...
That’s where the link is to. I’m guessing metronews got it from…BlueGoldNews.
by Country Roads on Aug 13, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I love Kirlav. I read these quotes and smile. This is why I never ever worry about the defensive line. We recruit 2 stars on the line and I don’t worry. We have no depth and I don’t worry. He will have the line ready. Of all the positions, you can bet the D-line will not be the reason we lose games. And it’s because he’s never satisfied.
Nothing to do with Kirlav but...
…I was just curious as to what others thought about this
According to this article, we are going to start doing more I-formation, which is fine. I’m worried about having a fairly young team learn 2 different systems.
The I-Formation
is stale compared to the Spread attack. Thank God, Rodriguez brought the spread after years of up the middle Don Nehlen football. One thing is for sure…..Spread offenses w/ speed get you 7-8 national appearances on the ESPN family of channels. I-Formation gets you 7-8 appearances on the only station you could possibly find this formation anymore…….The Big Ten Network.
People in Ohio used to salivate when watching WVU games. Everyone would tell me how exciting it is to watch their style of play. For instance, they have Terrelle Pryor and most fans still aren’t satisfied because Jim Bouman (OSU’s OC) is a horrible coach and has NO IDEA of spread offenses. Pryor definitely made a mistake going to OSU based on his skill set and the school’s offensive strengths/philosophy.
Sure, it’s simply a formation and the players and the plays, themselves, determine the excitement level, but the news that Stewart will revert to the I-formation at times is not surprising at all.
Just one time I want to hear him say, “Surprise, Surprise, Surprise” or “Well, Golllllllly!”
Funny You Should Say That
Because this sure looks like Vince Young and Texas running the I-formation. Too bad they didn’t have any success while he was there.
by Country Roads on Aug 13, 2009 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Variation is what we need.
Running option read left, option read right and bubble screens right did not bring us an undefeated season. Running the I and passing the ball brought us two.
I don’t think we should use it a lot but our two biggest runs in the Fiesta Bowl came from the I.
by 5th Year Senior on Aug 13, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions
And Sugar Bowl---Slaton's First 52 Yard TD
Wait, you mean Rod ran some plays from the I, too?
by Country Roads on Aug 13, 2009 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Regular season...
I’m fucking sorry smart ass
by 5th Year Senior on Aug 14, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions
The age old question…would you rather go undefeated in the regular season and lose the bowl game or 10-1 and win the Sugar. I’d probably go with the BCS win, but it’s a very close call.
And Rodriguez ran alot out of the I formation in 2003. Alot of single back double tight end zone blocking stretch plays out of the I formation. I was not a fan.
It always amuses me how the 52 yard draw play againt UGA was successful. We never lined up in the “I” that year, let alone threw from it. Yet Georgia bought the pass blocking and thought our freshman QB was going to throw from the “I” for the first time all year on like the 4th play of the game.
Undefeated Regular Season
Every time, no questions asked. Yes, winning BCS bowls is nice, but playing for national championships is so much better for your program, even if you lose them. It’s about twice the exposure, plus the bragging rights over everyone you play in the regular season.
by Country Roads on Aug 14, 2009 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Nehlen
That Slaton 52 yard run was on a Don Nehlen draw play out of the I none the less!

by 


















