Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Worst Team Ever Projected?

Predicting The Spreads of 2009

Instead of just blindly predicting wins and losses for 2009 (cough, 5th Year Senior, cough), I thought I would try to take an objective look -- or as close to one as is possible when you run a pro-WVU blog -- at the point spreads of this season.  Obviously, a lot will change in just a few weeks and months, but hopefully, this gives us all a pretty good expectation of each game throughout the season.

Star-divide

WVU vs. Liberty (no line)

As you probably know, there are rarely spreads offered against I-AA opponents.  But know this: Liberty is not Villanova or James Madison.  This isn't a bad football team, but it certainly does not quite stack up to those teams of years past.  If there was a line, it would 40+.

WVU vs. East Carolina (WVU -6)

Memories of last year's disaster in Greenville are still too fresh, but this is still a team that WVU should defeat in 2009.  It won't be easy, as is evidenced by the less than a touchdown margin.  Still, WVU possesses greater depth and a home field advantage, something ECU hasn't bested in Morgantown since, oh right, never.

West Virginia @ Auburn (Auburn -2)

I believe this is a game that WVU will win.  But, since it will be a night game on The Plains, Auburn will most likely get the slight edge due to the massive home field advantage.  This should be a line that can be taken advantage of, knowing WVU's recent history with SEC opponents.  Hint: it's good.  Also, Auburn opens with La. Tech and Miss. State, meaning they will also likely be 2-0, and the Chizik era will still have some luster.  It won't last.

WVU vs. Colorado (WVU -7.5)

This is still a weak Colorado team, the same weak Colorado team that beat the Mountaineers in Boulder last year.  I expect WVU, this time, to perform a tad better, because if they were to play worse, the stadium might collapse on itself.  Colorado also must visit Mountaineer Field on a Thursday night, where the home team is almost unstoppable.

WVU @ Syracuse (WVU -22.5)

Syracuse's talent level and a first year head-coach don't mix well, and this will be a tough year for Doug Marrone, though I don't think anyone in central NY is mourning Greg Robinson's departure.  Still, WVU hasn't lost in the dome since 2001, and rarely are the games close between these two former rivals.  Last time they played in Syracuse, only 35,000 showed up.  Even with the hype around Marrone, that might be about right for this year, too.

WVU vs. Marshall (WVU -27)

Marshall sucks.  Look, I could only stay objective for so long.  But that's still how the spread will look, bias or not.

WVU vs. UConn (WVU -14.5)

This is the last real counted upon win before the meat of the schedule.  Edsall has done a very good job in Storrs (or, East Hartford?  Whatever.), but he just lost way too much talent to the NFL this past year.  It will take a season or two to get UConn back up to the level of the past two years.

WVU @ USF (USF -6)

West Virginia doesn't have much of track-record of beating USF, let alone beating them in Tampa.  Even in the dead of winter in Pat White's last game, WVU struggled to squeak past the west-central Floridians.  It will be even tougher, facing a team most likely favored to win the conference, on their home turf.  Every game may be winnable this year, but this may be the toughest.

WVU vs. Louisville (WVU -27)

Louisville is terrible, and this is almost certain to be Steve Kragthorpe's last trip to Morgantown.  The only bright spot is former WVU-verbal and now UL running back Victor Anderson.

WVU @ Cincinnati (Cincinnati -1)

I believe this is another very winnable game, but I don't make the spreads; Vegas does.  Cincinnati graduated their entire defense, but return playmakers Tony Pike and Mardy Gilyard.  You'll remember Gilyard for killing us on the opening kickoff last year.  The Bearcats will certainly get some looks to win the wide-open Big East, but Nippert just isn't that much of a home-field advantage.  Still, it's a night game and not Mountaineer Field.  The Friday scheduling may make it tougher for Mountaineer fans to attend, too.

WVU vs. Pitt (WVU -2)

This series has become a series again, after WVU threatened to run away with games a few years ago.  The last two have been tough on WVU, but getting Pitt at home with a very, very fired up late-season crowd should be enough to carry the home team.  If not, I will covertly shave Wannstedt's mustache the night before, throwing their entire gameplan into a tailspin.  And yes, they're gameplan is centered around his mustache.

WVU @ Rutgers (Rutgers -3)

No way we lose to Rutgers.  No. Way.  Yet, they'll still be favored.  But we do not lose to that school.  Not then.  Not now.  Not ever.

So, there you have it.  Favored in eight games, underdogs in the other three.  Still, we won't be underdogs by much, staying within a touchdown against every favorite.

Again, I think every game this season is winnable.  It's also possible we lose all the games we're supposed to, plus one or two others (ECU, Colorado, Pitt).  I'm optimistic, but I think Vegas, at least right now, sees us as an 8-4 squad.

Thoughts?  Questions?  Complaints?   Marriage Proposals?  Death Threats?  Post all below.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Dumb question

I’ve often wondered what’s the difference between one team being “+1” versus the other being “-1”.

Comments:
I might take the under on all those spreads. I just don’t see us blowing anybody away like we did at times in the recent past. I think 14.5 pts at UConn might be a bit aggressive even though we seem to beat them pretty bad all the time. On a related note, it pisses me off when those pussys say that they were co-Big East champs two years ago even though we obliterated them 66-21. You should be able to ever be a co-conference champ if you lose the head-to-head battle.

by WVU-Atlanta on Jul 29, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Response

1) If you’re -1, you’re favored by 1. +1 is obviously the opposite. If a book goes with the +1, -1 spread, they’re essentially doubling their chance for a push, increasing their take on the game.

2) We’re home to UConn.

by Dr. Charley West on Jul 29, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

My take

We beat Liberty by 3 TDs
ECU 17, WVU 14
What do Gene Chizik and Bill Stewart have in common? Neither should be head coaches in Div. I: WVU 13 Auburn 10
That Dan Hawkins guy will outcoach our ol’ timer in this one and be a shocker to our fans on Thurs. night: CU 20 WVU 14
Syracuse is awful: WVU 30 Syracuse 10
This will be the closest Marshall game in the series: WVU 27 Marshall 17
UCONN misses D. Brown: WVU 14 UCONN 12
WVU blows away Loserville: WVU 28 Louisville 3
Will be at this one: Cincy 20 WVU 13
Wouldn’t miss this one: PITT 28 WVU 10 (PITT will win the conference)
Rutgers: I didn’t even realize they still played football: Rutgers 21 WVU 20
I don’t care about USF…they are like Maryland and do NOTHING for me: USF 28 WVU 10

Will finish 6-6 and reach our goal of going to a bowl game!!!!!!! Yes! Fans will be able to purchase all the latest bowl gear and proudly wear it while we play UTEP in the Toilet Bowl presented by the Cleveland Browns

My bad….we won’t be bowl eligible because Liberty isn’t Division IA

Instead, karma will return to the Mountain State and rightfully dispose of the cartoon character that is currently the head coach of WVU football. Those in authoritative positions will realize that you can’t hire a football coach based on ONE fuel driven/we have nothing to lose and Oklahoma has everything to lose/exhibition game, and the many posters of smokingmusket.com will initiate a collective apology to WVUColumbus for being sooooo damn right in the first place :)

by WVUColumbus on Jul 29, 2009 9:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Still amazed

At how you never miss a chance to be extremely negative in all of your posts.

Are you excited about the upcoming football season for any other reason than you hope to be proven right about your doom and gloom predictions?

by 5th Year Senior on Jul 29, 2009 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly right!

I am excited about the upcoming season……I think Coach Huggs is going to have his guys ready and we’ll compete for a BEAST Regular season champ.

Oh…..football…..Not excited AT ALL. It’s not gloom and doom when it is a given that it WILL happen.

by WVUColumbus on Jul 30, 2009 7:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Mark this post.

Let’s come back to it after the season and see how we fared in our predictions (I think you said 7-5 in the other thread). Then, when we go 9-3, you can forget all about how you underestimated the team by 3 games and just focus on how you can’t believe we lost those 3 games to teams with inferior talent. Sound about right to you?

Oh, and Liberty actually does count for bowl eligibility. They changed that rule a couple years ago.

by Country Roads on Jul 30, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the West By God Virginia Mountaineers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Pitt-West Virginia: First five possessions
Small
WVU Among the Nation's Elite in College Athletics
Wvu_logo_small
Official Nickname Nominations for HC Dana Holgorsen
Small
Orange Bowl Victory Poem
Small
Get Tom Bradley when Casteel leaves
Owen_small
CASTEEL IS GONE
Small
Orange Bowl Preview
Rhodes_dusty_small
Todd Graham leaving Pitt with tail between legs and heading for Arizona State
Gopher_small
Patton...er, Huggin's Speech For The 2011 Backyard Brawl
Mountaineermascot_small
Setting the Program's Holgorsen DNA

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Helmet_small WVUIE97

Editors

Bridge_small 5th Year Senior

Johndenver_small Country Roads

Authors

Standing_at_the_station_small JP Fanshawe

1_small JohnRadcliff

Me-_small Caleb Wygal

Mountaineermascot_small Mountaineer Chuck